Bill O'Reilly - Leadership

Leadership

Bill O'Reilly
Thursday, Mar 31, 2011

This time next year, we could have the two presidential candidates in play. Only God knows who the Republicans will decide upon, but President Obama is a lock on the Democratic side. The big issues that will most likely decide the election of 2012 will be the economy and leadership. And now there's new data on the leadership front.

According to a Gallup poll released this week, President Obama has fallen more than 20 points in the leadership category in less than two years. Right now, 52% of Americans believe he is a strong and decisive leader, while 47% say he is not. Bad news for the prez.

Truthfully, much of the leadership issue these days is driven by style. The last strong leader America had was President Reagan, who came across as a tough, but not belligerent, guy. Mr. Reagan fired the air traffic controllers (thereby busting the union), demanded that the Soviets tear down the wall in East Germany, and generally governed with a good-natured confidence. His acting experience helped him project authority and benevolence at the same time—not an easy thing to do.

President Bush 41 came across rather fatherly, even when waging war against Saddam. Bill Clinton had little authority because of his controversies. And Bush 43's battlefield setbacks eroded his leadership image.

Barack Obama is a deliberative leader, a man who seeks consensus before acting. He took months before committing more troops to Afghanistan, did not alter the Bush strategy in Iraq even after criticizing it, and seemed to be indecisive about Libya. French President Sarkozy was the guy who drove the military action, with Mr. Obama hitching a ride on the Frenchman's passion.

In turbulent times, people naturally look for leaders who can bring them comfort and reassurance. At this point, President Obama is having trouble doing that, and the Gallup poll reflects that reality. Mr. Obama's style is cool and sometimes distant. When waging war or trying to prevent economic disaster, detachment can be detrimental. Rallying the troops usually wins the day.

President Lincoln was the nation's strongest leader, with George Washington second and Franklin Roosevelt third. All three had huge problems to solve and did so with courage and bold decision making. Lincoln, in particular, was constantly under siege. If the Confederates had won the battle of Gettysburg, the Union might have been shattered forever. Lincoln knew that. Yet, he remained strong, in control, and did what he had to do to hold the country together... even suspending Habeas Corpus.

President Obama is a big admirer of Lincoln, as is George W. Bush. Both men understand that true leadership requires stone-cold courage and a brilliant decision making capability. Most human beings fall short in both categories, which is why true leadership is rarely on display.

But if it is in 2012, the person who shows it will be president.

Very good analysis.

Not really. He's stronger than Bush was, for sure, and he's got the majority of backing he needs to win the election.

This is a pale attempt from the right to blatantly lie in face of the evidence.

Cookie Parker wrote:Not really. He's stronger than Bush was, for sure,

How so?

Cookie Parker wrote:and he's got the majority of backing he needs to win the election.

How do you come up with that?

Cookie Parker wrote:This is a pale attempt from the right to blatantly lie in face of the evidence.

I'm getting tired of this right here. You need to go back and re-read the rules of the forum before making such statements. Back it up if you think it's true otherwise.