ABC never had plans to vet the name, they were looking for a Tea Party “connection”

Media Again Smears the “Violent” Tea Party

Katie Pavlich
Townhall
July 20, 2012

The facts surrounding the horrific shooting today in Aurora, Colorado are still coming in, but one thing is clear: the mainstream media is still hell bent on linking the Tea Party to violent occurrences as much as possible, with zero evidence to prove it.

Earlier, ABC News’ Brian Ross linked the Tea Party to the shooting by pointing out “there is a Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colorado on the Colorado Tea Party site talking about joining the Tea Party last year. Now we don’t know if this is the same Jim Holmes, but it is a Jim Holmes of Colorado.”

Did you catch that? “We don’t know if this is the same Jim Holmes.” An outlet with any journalism ethics at all wouldn’t report any name of any person until it was confirmed they were a suspect. Host George Stephanopoulos said the finding “might be significant” before ABC issued a retraction (a rare occurance). But why did they report it at all? Simply to smear the Tea Party as violent, an accusation that has never been backed up by evidence or fact.

“An earlier ABC News broadcast report suggested that a Jim Holmes of a Colorado Tea Party organization might be the suspect, but that report was incorrect. ABC News and Brian Ross apologize for the mistake, and for disseminating that information before it was properly vetted,” the retraction said.

The problem is, ABC never had plans to vet the name, they were looking for the Tea Party “connection” since the words “massive shooting” came across the news wires. ABC didn’t bother to call the Colorado Tea Party Patriots, verify the man’s name, call James Holmes or engage in any other form of verification. Like squeezing toothpaste out of a tube, the entire goal was to plant a “the Tea Party is violent” seed back in the minds of viewers.

Clearly the MSM's penchant for perfidy knows no boundaries.

Question:
Did this reporter give any connection to any organization prior to the name being released (Did he say "he's a tea party wacko" or "he's an occupy moron" before the name was known?)

If that was the case, isn't that much worse?

He named someone by name who is a hispanic tea party person, and now he's getting death threats b/c of Ross' actions. And it doesn't matter how he said it, he planted the seed that it was a tea partier.

TheNextPrez2012 wrote:Question:
Did this reporter give any connection to any organization prior to the name being released (Did he say "he's a tea party wacko" or "he's an occupy moron" before the name was known?)

If that was the case, isn't that much worse?

Why didn't Ross check to see if the guy was part of Occupy Denver?

Same thing.