Did Labour deliberately "poison the wells"?
2 posters
Did Labour deliberately "poison the wells"?
Labour hid ‘scorched earth’ debts worth billions
THE government last night accused Labour of pursuing a “scorched earth policy” before the general election, leaving behind billions of pounds of previously hidden spending commitments.
The newly discovered Whitehall “black holes” could force even more severe public spending cuts, or higher tax rises, ministers fear.
Vince Cable, the business secretary, said: “I fear that a lot of bad news about the public finances has been hidden and stored up for the new government. The skeletons are starting to fall out of the cupboard.”
The new cabinet has been discovering previously unknown contracts and uncosted spending commitments left by their spendthrift predecessors.
“There are some worrying early signs that numbers left by the outgoing government may not add up,” said Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister.
David Willetts, the universities minister, claimed that Labour had left behind “not so much an in-tray as a minefield”.
Billions of pounds in public money was committed in the run-up to the election campaign in a deliberate strategy to boost Labour’s chances at the ballot box and sabotage the next government.
One former Labour minister told The Sunday Times: “There was collusion between ministers and civil servants to get as many contracts signed off as possible before the election was called.”
One former adviser to the schools department said there was a deliberate policy of “scorched earth”. “The atmosphere was ‘pull up all the railways, burn the grain stores, leave nothing for the Tories’,” he added.The “black holes” that ministers have already unearthed include:
- A series of defence contracts signed shortly before the election, including a £13 billion tanker aircraft programme whose cost has “astonished and baffled” ministers.
- £420m of school building contracts, many targeting Labour marginals, signed off by Ed Balls, the former schools secretary, weeks before the general election was called.
- The troubled £1.2 billion “e-borders” IT project for the immigration service, which, sources say, is running even later and more over-budget than Labour ministers had admitted.
- A crisis in the student loans company where extra cash may be needed to prevent a repeat of last year’s failure to process tens of thousands of claims on time.
- The multi-billion-pound cost of decommissioning old nuclear power plants, which ministers claim has not been properly accounted for in Whitehall budgets.
- A £600m computer contract for the new personal pensions account scheme rushed through by Labour this year, which will still cost at least £25m even if it is cancelled.
[ARTICLE CONTINUES]
If this is a deliberate act of sabotage, and there is every reason to believe that it is, then Labour deserve to be out of power for a long time to come.
Re: Did Labour deliberately "poison the wells"?
Sounds pretty bad to me. Corruption knows no ideology nor any nationality.
Keep us posted as to what kind of sh!t they drudge up.
Keep us posted as to what kind of sh!t they drudge up.
TexasBlue
Re: Did Labour deliberately "poison the wells"?
Oh I'm sure that enough will come up between now and the emergency budget in a few weeks time. Watch this space.
Re: Did Labour deliberately "poison the wells"?
The_Amber_Spyglass wrote:Watch this space.
It's always when one party gets the boot that the bullshit starts coming out. It happened to the GOP in '06 and '08. It's the Dems' turn this November. lol
TexasBlue
Similar topics
» Reflections on New Labour movement as the party chooses a new leader in Ed Miliband
» Meet the New "Coffee Party" Movement.
» Mainstream Media's "Flotilla" Fraud
» Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" blog
» Barbara Boxer - GOP Bill Will Poison and Kill 81,000
» Meet the New "Coffee Party" Movement.
» Mainstream Media's "Flotilla" Fraud
» Ben Goldacre's "Bad Science" blog
» Barbara Boxer - GOP Bill Will Poison and Kill 81,000
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum